SuperHuman Fund · 1 Sep 2026

US company is editing human embryos. Legally. And I'm an investor.

Dear friends -

A company is editing human embryos inside the US. Legally, right now. And I'm an investor.

In June, Origin Genomics received IRB approval to run in vitro gene correction on human embryos at its New York facility. Origin says it is the first company ever granted it. Research only, implantation remains a bottleneck in the US, and that line still matters. But an ethics board in the United States has now looked at germline editing inside a commercial lab and said yes. The science is maturing, and regulation is catching up. That's a potent combo.

I've been arguing for a while that the conception and embryo genomics stack is the least obvious big thing in frontier bio. This is the month it stopped being theoretical.

origin genomics IRB approval

Things I’m looking at right now:

Another reason I am bullish on this space is that, outside of editing, there are companies on the market already generating revenues today - offering services such as polygenic embryo selection. This was not the case 1 or 2 years ago. After much research and interviews, I've recently invested in the scientific leader in this space - Herasight. I've linked my X article on their technology, above. I have also previously funded an artificial womb company, still in stealth.
I am actively looking at other companies engineering new products unlocking complementary capabilities, across this stack. Place all these in a context where 130 out of 194 countries are below population replacement levels, 26% of childless couples experience impaired fertility, whilst IVF has crossed 2% of all US births and is not stopping there. I will be publishing my detailed thesis on this space soon - stay tuned!

Outside of embryo genomics, it's hard not to be also bullish on the AI-enabled biotech thesis. The situation here is the mirror image of the former. The capital has arrived with a bang (Isomorphic Labs having raised $2.1B alone!). Yet, 95% of AI drug discovery startups today raise on vibes alone, with no hard data to prove their approach moves the needle where it matters.

Therefore, one has to dig deep beneath the headlines, and be discerning. The question to ask is: 'What data did you generate that did not exist before you started?', 'How hard is it to replicate?, and 'How well does it tie to outcomes, outside of simulation?' Each question gets progressively harder to answer. I’m actively monitoring the space and talking to anyone who has a credible horse in the race.

New investments:

I’ve mentioned Herasight. I’ve also participated in the $8M Series A extension of Kadence Bio - a sexual enhancement company, starting with the development of the first FDA-approved treatment for premature ejaculation. They’re currently wrapping up their Phase 2 clinical trials. 
The company is backed by the billionaire Christian Angermayer -  whom I had on the podcast recently to explain his thesis on human enhancement going mainstream, and what it means for consumer pharma. It can be summarized in one sentence as ‘vanity drugs make more money than AI’ - and it’s a thesis I share. People spend more than $370b a year, cash, on looking and feeling better. No insurer, no formulary, no prior authorization. This is 5x more than all AI frontier lab revenues today. And GLP-1s are just getting started. Btw, Christian’s other company, Atai Beckley, just got acquired by Eli Lilly for up to $3.8b.

Trends aside, I’ve passed up on most peptide companies where branding is the only differentiating factor and no IP or supply chain moats exist. I’ve also passed up on several lab automation startups at risk of falling into the fragile middleware category. Many biotechs claiming to be building a platform, without focusing on proving a single asset. And any startups promising incremental improvement of existing healthcare delivery, instead of unlocking new capabilities.

Portfolio updates:

On Accelerate Bio pod

Billions are pouring into AI drug discovery. Zero approved drugs. But that's about to change.

I sat down with the Sam Altman-backed Retro Biosciences Head of Applied AI Rico Meinl, to talk protein engineering, virtual cells, autonomous laboratories, AI co-scientists, why generating “black-box data” may matter more than building larger models, and what's required to turn AI breakthroughs into drugs that actually work.

Video thumbnail

In other news

Germline

Embryo selection becomes a geopolitical race

The West is still assembling ethics committees while China runs polygenic embryo screening at commercial scale. The bearish scenario is not that gene editing goes wrong, it is that one country selects a generation for IQ and disease resistance and everyone else spends the decade debating whether they were allowed to.

AI x Bio

Anthropic quietly built a vertical biotech stack

Claude for Life Sciences in October 2025, Claude for Healthcare at JPM26 in January, a roughly $400M all-stock acquisition of Coefficient Bio in April, and a $200M Gates Foundation partnership in May. That is not a feature roadmap, it is a frontier lab deciding biology is the application layer worth owning.

Supply Chain

Eli Lilly sues six grey-market retatrutide sellers

Lilly filed against six compounders and is pressing card networks and platforms to cut off the rest. The tell is that a $140B company needed litigation to find a supply chain problem that verification infrastructure could have flagged two years ago. The science was never the hard part. Provenance is. Why I think Lilly sued the wrong problem →

China

A third of global out-licensing now starts in China

China now sources about 32% of global biopharma out-licensing deals, up from 5% in 2020, and leads the world in ADC deal count. US pharma pipelines are increasingly filled with molecules discovered elsewhere. America did not invent the assembly line either, it just manufactured better than anyone. That worked once.

Regulation

FDA panel backs six peptides, and nothing changes yet

The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted for BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, MOTS-c, Epitalon and Semax on margins as thin as 8-6, against FDA staff's own written recommendation. It is a required consultation, not a rule. Compounding stays unlawful until a proposed rule, a comment period and a final rule land, which last took twenty-six months. Everyone will cite it as permission anyway.

De-extinction

Colossal in talks at a $20 to 30B valuation

Up from $10.2B sixteen months earlier, with no extinct species revived. Investors are not buying mammoths. They are buying multiplex CRISPR editing, artificial wombs and a computational pipeline that happens to have the best public relations engine in biotech attached to it. What investors are actually buying at $30B →

Epigenetics

NewLimit hits $3.1B before dosing a human

A $435M Series C led by Founders Fund, the third raise in twelve months, tripling the valuation as a liver cell reprogramming candidate moves toward trials. Public biotechs with Phase 1 data and dosed patients trade below it. The market is pricing the platform, not the pipeline, which is a bet on the next decade rather than the next readout. My question about what this valuation prices →

Wearables

Lilly takes an equity stake in Oura

Lilly joined Oura's Series E to support GLP-1 patients, and both sides insist no user data is shared. Lilly already owns the best-selling drug on earth, so it did not need another molecule. It needed continuous physiology on the people taking the one it has. Drugs are becoming subscriptions, and subscriptions need telemetry. Why Lilly bought a seat next to the data →


About SuperHuman Fund

We invest in companies accelerating human enhancement. Our sweet spot is consumer bio and moonshots that traditional pharma is structurally incapable of funding - just before they hit an inflection. 

Over the past year, we have screened 1,300+ deals, investing in the best 0.7%. We’ve co-invested alongside or were followed on by Draper, 1517, Techstars, Accel, Mayo Clinic, and a16z. Our founders are alumni of YCombinator, Stanford, Apple, University of Oxford, Thiel Fellowship, Harvard, and others.

We are on track building the go-to brand in Humanity 2.0 - having generated 5M+ impressions on X, 1M+ on LinkedIn, and 20k+ impressions for our Accelerate Bio podcast, this quarter.

We are committed to building in public as much as possible (within the limitations of our portfolio and investor confidentiality) - in order to grow the space and see the first trillion-dollar human enhancement company, this decade.

*In my element, talking to builders at the frontier of AI-enabled bio

The ask