SuperHuman Fund · 1 Sep 2026
US company is editing human embryos. Legally. And I'm an investor.
Dear friends -
A company is editing human embryos inside the US. Legally, right now. And I'm an investor.
In June, Origin Genomics received IRB approval to run in vitro gene correction on human embryos at its New York facility. Origin says it is the first company ever granted it. Research only, implantation remains a bottleneck in the US, and that line still matters. But an ethics board in the United States has now looked at germline editing inside a commercial lab and said yes. The science is maturing, and regulation is catching up. That's a potent combo.
I've been arguing for a while that the conception and embryo genomics stack is the least obvious big thing in frontier bio. This is the month it stopped being theoretical.

Things I’m looking at right now:
Another reason I am bullish on this space is that, outside of editing, there are companies on the market already generating revenues today - offering services such as polygenic embryo selection. This was not the case 1 or 2 years ago. After much research and interviews, I've recently invested in the scientific leader in this space - Herasight. I've linked my X article on their technology, above. I have also previously funded an artificial womb company, still in stealth.
I am actively looking at other companies engineering new products unlocking complementary capabilities, across this stack. Place all these in a context where 130 out of 194 countries are below population replacement levels, 26% of childless couples experience impaired fertility, whilst IVF has crossed 2% of all US births and is not stopping there. I will be publishing my detailed thesis on this space soon - stay tuned!
Outside of embryo genomics, it's hard not to be also bullish on the AI-enabled biotech thesis. The situation here is the mirror image of the former. The capital has arrived with a bang (Isomorphic Labs having raised $2.1B alone!). Yet, 95% of AI drug discovery startups today raise on vibes alone, with no hard data to prove their approach moves the needle where it matters.
Therefore, one has to dig deep beneath the headlines, and be discerning. The question to ask is: 'What data did you generate that did not exist before you started?', 'How hard is it to replicate?, and 'How well does it tie to outcomes, outside of simulation?' Each question gets progressively harder to answer. I’m actively monitoring the space and talking to anyone who has a credible horse in the race.

New investments:
I’ve mentioned Herasight. I’ve also participated in the $8M Series A extension of Kadence Bio - a sexual enhancement company, starting with the development of the first FDA-approved treatment for premature ejaculation. They’re currently wrapping up their Phase 2 clinical trials.
The company is backed by the billionaire Christian Angermayer - whom I had on the podcast recently to explain his thesis on human enhancement going mainstream, and what it means for consumer pharma. It can be summarized in one sentence as ‘vanity drugs make more money than AI’ - and it’s a thesis I share. People spend more than $370b a year, cash, on looking and feeling better. No insurer, no formulary, no prior authorization. This is 5x more than all AI frontier lab revenues today. And GLP-1s are just getting started. Btw, Christian’s other company, Atai Beckley, just got acquired by Eli Lilly for up to $3.8b.
Trends aside, I’ve passed up on most peptide companies where branding is the only differentiating factor and no IP or supply chain moats exist. I’ve also passed up on several lab automation startups at risk of falling into the fragile middleware category. Many biotechs claiming to be building a platform, without focusing on proving a single asset. And any startups promising incremental improvement of existing healthcare delivery, instead of unlocking new capabilities.
Portfolio updates:
Origin Genomics received the first-ever IRB approval to conduct human embryo gene editing experiments, within the US.
Dognosis reported ~90% sensitivity for early-stage cancer across 20+ cancer types, and opened Phase 3 across 10 hospitals and 10,000 patients.
Herasight launched PGT-H, cutting intellectual disability risk from 8% to ~4% for first-cousin couples selecting among five embryos.
Lume Health launched its cortisol pilot study with Equinox in San Francisco, for the first continuous wearable hormone monitor
Kadence Bio told BIO 2026 it is ahead of schedule on KH-001's Phase 2a, with clinical proof-of-concept data due in December.
On Accelerate Bio pod
Billions are pouring into AI drug discovery. Zero approved drugs. But that's about to change.
I sat down with the Sam Altman-backed Retro Biosciences Head of Applied AI Rico Meinl, to talk protein engineering, virtual cells, autonomous laboratories, AI co-scientists, why generating “black-box data” may matter more than building larger models, and what's required to turn AI breakthroughs into drugs that actually work.

Full podcast | X article summary
In other news
Germline
Embryo selection becomes a geopolitical race
The West is still assembling ethics committees while China runs polygenic embryo screening at commercial scale. The bearish scenario is not that gene editing goes wrong, it is that one country selects a generation for IQ and disease resistance and everyone else spends the decade debating whether they were allowed to.
AI x Bio
Anthropic quietly built a vertical biotech stack
Claude for Life Sciences in October 2025, Claude for Healthcare at JPM26 in January, a roughly $400M all-stock acquisition of Coefficient Bio in April, and a $200M Gates Foundation partnership in May. That is not a feature roadmap, it is a frontier lab deciding biology is the application layer worth owning.
Supply Chain
Eli Lilly sues six grey-market retatrutide sellers
Lilly filed against six compounders and is pressing card networks and platforms to cut off the rest. The tell is that a $140B company needed litigation to find a supply chain problem that verification infrastructure could have flagged two years ago. The science was never the hard part. Provenance is. Why I think Lilly sued the wrong problem →
China
A third of global out-licensing now starts in China
China now sources about 32% of global biopharma out-licensing deals, up from 5% in 2020, and leads the world in ADC deal count. US pharma pipelines are increasingly filled with molecules discovered elsewhere. America did not invent the assembly line either, it just manufactured better than anyone. That worked once.
Regulation
FDA panel backs six peptides, and nothing changes yet
The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted for BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, MOTS-c, Epitalon and Semax on margins as thin as 8-6, against FDA staff's own written recommendation. It is a required consultation, not a rule. Compounding stays unlawful until a proposed rule, a comment period and a final rule land, which last took twenty-six months. Everyone will cite it as permission anyway.
De-extinction
Colossal in talks at a $20 to 30B valuation
Up from $10.2B sixteen months earlier, with no extinct species revived. Investors are not buying mammoths. They are buying multiplex CRISPR editing, artificial wombs and a computational pipeline that happens to have the best public relations engine in biotech attached to it. What investors are actually buying at $30B →
Epigenetics
NewLimit hits $3.1B before dosing a human
A $435M Series C led by Founders Fund, the third raise in twelve months, tripling the valuation as a liver cell reprogramming candidate moves toward trials. Public biotechs with Phase 1 data and dosed patients trade below it. The market is pricing the platform, not the pipeline, which is a bet on the next decade rather than the next readout. My question about what this valuation prices →
Wearables
Lilly takes an equity stake in Oura
Lilly joined Oura's Series E to support GLP-1 patients, and both sides insist no user data is shared. Lilly already owns the best-selling drug on earth, so it did not need another molecule. It needed continuous physiology on the people taking the one it has. Drugs are becoming subscriptions, and subscriptions need telemetry. Why Lilly bought a seat next to the data →

About SuperHuman Fund
We invest in companies accelerating human enhancement. Our sweet spot is consumer bio and moonshots that traditional pharma is structurally incapable of funding - just before they hit an inflection.
Over the past year, we have screened 1,300+ deals, investing in the best 0.7%. We’ve co-invested alongside or were followed on by Draper, 1517, Techstars, Accel, Mayo Clinic, and a16z. Our founders are alumni of YCombinator, Stanford, Apple, University of Oxford, Thiel Fellowship, Harvard, and others.
We are on track building the go-to brand in Humanity 2.0 - having generated 5M+ impressions on X, 1M+ on LinkedIn, and 20k+ impressions for our Accelerate Bio podcast, this quarter.
We are committed to building in public as much as possible (within the limitations of our portfolio and investor confidentiality) - in order to grow the space and see the first trillion-dollar human enhancement company, this decade.

*In my element, talking to builders at the frontier of AI-enabled bio
The ask
If you are building in embryo genomics, direct-to-consumer bio, AI pharma, or human capability enhancement - I want the narrow provable bet, not the grand vision slide. Reply to this email or DM me on X.
If you're an investor who wants the conception stack thesis when it's out, reply to this email and I'll send it.
If you disagree with any part of my thesis and can make a rational argument to support it, I’d love to hear from you too. Will reply to all.